When you think about the financial agility of your business or personal portfolio, the decision often comes down to choosing between immediate liquidity and long-term growth. Traditionally, accessing cash meant selling off assets, which often led to tax liabilities and the loss of future compounding. However, a smarter alternative exists: the ability to pledge without selling.
By opting for a loan against mutual funds, you can bridge your immediate capital requirements while keeping your investment strategy intact. This process involves the strategic use of lending against securities to unlock value from your portfolio.
While the units are used as collateral, understanding the distinction between lien vs ownership is crucial for any investor looking to maximize their financial potential without disrupting their wealth creation journey.
Understanding the Legal Framework of Lien vs Ownership
The concept of lien vs ownership is at the heart of how a loan against mutual funds operates.
When you pledge your units, you do not transfer the title of the assets to the lender; instead, you remain the registered owner of the units. A "lien" is simply a legal claim or a "hold" that a lender places on your assets as security for the debt.
Under the rules of lending against securities, this lien ensures that while the units are in your account, you cannot sell or transfer them without the lender's permission. It acts as a safety barrier for the financial institution, ensuring they have first rights to the asset if a default occurs.
Despite this restriction, your status as an owner remains legally valid, and the units stay in your name in the records of the Asset Management Company (AMC) or the registrar.
Nowadays, marking a lien has become a seamless experience. When you apply for a loan against mutual funds, the lender coordinates with registrars like CAMS or KFintech to mark the units as pledged. This is often done via OTP-based authentication, making the process of lending against securities efficient and transparent for the borrower.
It is important to note that a lien is marked on specific units, not a fixed monetary amount. If you pledge 500 units for a loan against mutual funds, those 500 units remain under lien even if their market value doubles.
This ensures that the lender’s security remains tied to the volume of the asset rather than just its fluctuating price.
If you repay a significant portion of your loan against mutual funds, many lenders allow for a partial release of units. This means you can free up a section of your portfolio from the lien while keeping the remaining units pledged for the balance amount, offering a flexible approach to lending against securities.
Economic Benefits You Retain During the Pledge
Pledging your mutual funds for a loan is often misunderstood as giving up the "profits" to the lender. In reality, the lender only has a claim on the units as collateral to ensure repayment; the actual economic performance of those units remains 100% yours.
Here are eight economic benefits you retain while your units are under a lien:
1. Full Capital Appreciation
The most significant benefit is that your units remain "live" in the market. If your mutual fund's Net Asset Value (NAV) grows from ₹100 to ₹130 during your loan tenure, that 30% gain belongs entirely to you. Your wealth continues to build in the background, often growing at a rate that partially or fully offsets the interest you are paying on the loan.
2. Receipt of Dividends and Payouts
If you are invested in "Income Distribution cum Capital Withdrawal" (IDCW) plans, any dividends declared by the fund house are credited directly to your registered bank account. The lender marks a lien on the units, not the cash flow they generate. This provides you with an ongoing stream of passive income even while the assets are pledged.
3. Uninterrupted Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs)
Marking a lien on existing units does not stop you from buying more. Your SIPs continue to function normally, adding new units to your folio every month. These new units are typically "free" (not under lien) unless you specifically choose to pledge them later to increase your credit limit.
4. Benefit of the Power of Compounding
Compounding works on the total volume of units you hold. Because you haven't sold your units to get cash, the "mathematical engine" of your investment stays at full throttle. Once the loan is repaid and the lien is lifted, your portfolio value reflects years of uninterrupted compounding, rather than a "restarted" journey.
5. Retained Voting and Ownership Rights
For certain types of funds or securities where voting rights might apply, those rights remain with you. You continue to be the "owner of record" in the books of the Asset Management Company (AMC) and the Registrar (CAMS/KFintech). The lender is merely a "lien-holder," not the new owner.
6. Automatic Credit Limit Scalability
As your fund's NAV appreciates, your "available margin" often increases automatically. Many digital lending platforms recalculate your limit daily. If your portfolio value jumps significantly, your credit line expands without you having to submit a fresh application or new documents.
7. Tax-Free Growth Accrual
Since there is no "sale" of units, you aren't paying Capital Gains Tax on the growth occurring during the pledge period. You are essentially allowing your tax liability to stay deferred while you use the lender’s money. This keeps more of your capital working for you instead of being lost to the taxman.
8. Eligibility for Portfolio Rebalancing
While you cannot sell the pledged units, you can still manage the rest of your portfolio. Furthermore, if you wish to exit a pledged fund, many lenders allow you to "swap" the collateral, pledging a new set of units to release the old ones. This ensures your investment strategy isn't "frozen" just because you have an active loan.
Limitations and Functional Rights of the Borrower
While your economic ownership is secure, the lien vs ownership dynamic does impose certain functional restrictions.
To ensure that the lending against securities remains a "secured" facility, the lender must have some control over the movement of the asset. You cannot treat pledged units as "liquid" in the traditional sense until the loan against mutual funds is settled.
These restrictions are the trade-off for not having to sell your assets. Understanding these limits is essential for effective portfolio management when you decide to pledge without selling. Most of these restrictions are purely administrative and do not affect the long-term value of your holdings.
Restriction on Redemptions
The most obvious limitation is that you cannot redeem or sell units that are currently under a lien. If you need to sell the units to book profits, you must first repay the loan against mutual funds to release the lien. This is the cornerstone of the lending against securities framework.
Inability to Switch Schemes
In the mutual fund world, a "switch" is technically a redemption from one scheme followed by a purchase in another. Since redemption is blocked under the lien vs ownership rules, you cannot switch your pledged units from an equity fund to a debt fund while the loan against mutual funds is active.
Impact of Margin Calls
If the market enters a volatile phase and the NAV of your pledged units drops significantly, the lender may issue a "margin call." In such cases of lending against securities, you may be required to pledge additional units or pay back a portion of the loan against mutual funds to keep the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio within the agreed limits.
Navigating the Loan-to-Value (LTV) Ratios
When you seek a loan against mutual funds, the amount you can borrow is determined by the LTV ratio. Lenders do not provide 100% of the value because they need a buffer against market fluctuations. This is a standard practice in lending against securities to protect the financial institution from volatility while allowing you to pledge without selling.
The LTV differs based on the risk profile of the fund. Equity funds, being more volatile, have a lower LTV, whereas debt funds allow for higher borrowing limits. Understanding these numbers is vital when comparing the lien vs ownership impact on your overall liquidity.
Fund Type | Maximum LTV | Purpose in Portfolio |
Equity Mutual Funds | 45% - 50% | High growth, higher "haircut" for risk. |
Debt Mutual Funds | 70% - 80% | Stable value, higher borrowing power. |
Hybrid Funds | 50% - 60% | Balanced risk and borrowing capacity. |
The difference between the market value and the loan amount is known as the "haircut." In lending against securities, this haircut ensures that even if the market dips by 10-15%, the lender’s loan against mutual funds remains fully covered by the collateral, preventing forced liquidations.
Lenders revalue your pledged portfolio periodically (often daily). If the value goes up, your available limit for the loan against mutual funds might increase, giving you more "headroom" for credit. This is one of the more flexible aspects of lending against securities.
The Path to Lien Removal and Full Control
The end of the lending against securities journey occurs when the loan is fully repaid. At this stage, the distinction between lien vs ownership disappears as the lien is legally revoked. Once you have cleared the principal and interest of your loan against mutual funds, the lender sends a "discharge" instruction to the registrar.
The process to pledge without selling is designed to be reversible. Once the "Release of Lien" is processed, the status of your units in the CAS (Common Account Statement) changes from "Pledged" to "Free." You then regain 100% functional control over your assets.
Always ensure you receive a "No Dues Certificate" from the lender after closing your loan against mutual funds. This document is your proof that the lending against securities arrangement has ended and that the lender no longer has a claim on your assets.
With the advent of digital systems, the time taken to remove a lien has drastically reduced. While it used to take weeks, most modern platforms can now process the release within 2 to 3 business days, allowing you to react quickly to market changes once the loan against mutual funds is settled.
Conclusion
Choosing to pledge without selling is a sophisticated financial move that aligns short-term liquidity needs with long-term wealth goals. By understanding the nuances of lien vs ownership, you can navigate the world of lending against securities with confidence. A loan against mutual funds offers a unique path to capital, one where you remain the beneficiary of your investment's growth while enjoying the flexibility of immediate cash. It is about making your money work for you in two places at once.
Ready to unlock the potential of your portfolio? Discover how easy it is to manage your liquidity with discvr.ai. Our loan against mutual funds product is designed for the modern investor who values speed, transparency, and the power of their own assets. Experience a smarter way of lending against securities and take control of your financial future today.